The VAT – a comparison..

March 31, 2010
By

Today’s installment describes the VAT, and how it would be managed under the current political environment.  Roger Bucholtz explains…

Citizens,

Two current issues:

1) A VAT is far superior to the income tax, however, when Washington talks about a VAT they are usually referring to it as an additional tax, not a tax to replace the current income tax code.  VAT taxes do stop the practice of punishing productive behaviors (work, saving, investing, etc) by taxing the fruits (income/money) of this behavior.  It also can be readily border adjusted (backed out of export prices) so that American labor and capitol can compete on a level playing field for the first time in generations. The problems with a VAT are that, but it is actually a somewhat hidden sales a sales tax included in the price of goods and services; and it has a high compliance cost that is also added to the cost of goods and services.  Burying taxes in prices is “good” for fooling the people by keeping them ignorant of their true tax burden, and ultimately results in bigger and more intrusive government.

2) We have cause to be disappointed in legislators’ lack of enthusiasm for upsetting the trade in tax favors that empowers and enriches most of our elected representatives, and those serving on the House Ways and Means Committee are where the real action is.  This is what the Potomac fever is all about.  We hope that the bodies of our representatives have natural defenses to the fever such as the best interest of constituents, the desire to do the right thing, and other such antibodies.  If these natural defenses prove insufficient then the best medicine approved by law and the election commission is fear. Fear of losing their position of power, privilege and riches can scare the fever out of the body politic.

To bring about that which we desire, the FairTax, we should try real hard to bring out the politicians’ natural defenses by informing them about the FairTax by every means possible, to include face to face meetings, letters, etc.  If that does not cure the disease, then that is the time to cause them to fear for their job.

Roger Buchholtz
MI FairTax President (volunteer)

Tags:

2 Responses to The VAT – a comparison..

  1. Bruce Barlond on April 1, 2010 at 9:28 am

    What formula is used to determine the “Prebate” paid out each month to each household under the Fair Tax?

  2. jgillman on April 1, 2010 at 10:24 am

    Bruce, the calculation is done using the federally recognized threshold for poverty. A family of four falls in at about $28k

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

Search MTTM

Survival Guide



Buy The Book!

RSS Daily Cap Con

  • Taxpayer Costs For Average State Employee Increased From $79K in 2001 to $95K in 2011 February 3, 2012
    Dems claims state employees 'gave back' $500 million in concessions — facts say otherwise By Tom Gantert | 2/3/2012 In 2001, the state paid $3.9 billion to 62,057 full-time employees, an average of $63,474 in total compensation for each employee. In 2011, the state paid $4.7 billion to 47,818 full-time employees, meaning total compensation per work […]
  • Analysis: The Unstoppable Teacher Pension Fund Monster February 3, 2012
    By James M. Hohman | 2/3/2012 The state’s teacher retirement system continues to increase burdens on taxpayers and local school districts. The costs exploded in the recent years, and without substantial reform there is no reason to expect that trend to change. http://www.michigancapitolconfidential.com/16387 […]

The Server which handles this site. HIGHLY Recommended.

Repeal The 17th Amendment





FireStats icon Powered by FireStats