<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: § 10 Limitations on terms of office of members of the United States House of Representatives and United States Senate from Michigan.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michigantaxes.com/wordpress/2010/01/%c2%a7-10-limitations-on-terms-of-office-of-members-of-the-united-states-house-of-representatives-and-united-states-senate-from-michigan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michigantaxes.com/wordpress/2010/01/%c2%a7-10-limitations-on-terms-of-office-of-members-of-the-united-states-house-of-representatives-and-united-states-senate-from-michigan/</link>
	<description>Ongoing discussion of how Michigan burdens its taxpayers as well as other Michigan Issues, Satire, and Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:10:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: recallposse.org &#187; US Senators Might Want To Pay attention</title>
		<link>http://michigantaxes.com/wordpress/2010/01/%c2%a7-10-limitations-on-terms-of-office-of-members-of-the-united-states-house-of-representatives-and-united-states-senate-from-michigan/comment-page-1/#comment-1357</link>
		<dc:creator>recallposse.org &#187; US Senators Might Want To Pay attention</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 12:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michigantaxes.com/wordpress/?p=3584#comment-1357</guid>
		<description>[...] have commented on the Michigan constitutional provision that allows recall before. I have further wondered what the language should be to make it as clear [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have commented on the Michigan constitutional provision that allows recall before. I have further wondered what the language should be to make it as clear [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Watch a very New New Jersey &#171; Michigan Taxes Too Much</title>
		<link>http://michigantaxes.com/wordpress/2010/01/%c2%a7-10-limitations-on-terms-of-office-of-members-of-the-united-states-house-of-representatives-and-united-states-senate-from-michigan/comment-page-1/#comment-1356</link>
		<dc:creator>Watch a very New New Jersey &#171; Michigan Taxes Too Much</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 12:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michigantaxes.com/wordpress/?p=3584#comment-1356</guid>
		<description>[...] have commented on the Michigan constitutional provision that allows recall before.  I have further wondered what the language should be to make it as [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have commented on the Michigan constitutional provision that allows recall before.  I have further wondered what the language should be to make it as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jgillman</title>
		<link>http://michigantaxes.com/wordpress/2010/01/%c2%a7-10-limitations-on-terms-of-office-of-members-of-the-united-states-house-of-representatives-and-united-states-senate-from-michigan/comment-page-1/#comment-1355</link>
		<dc:creator>jgillman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 20:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michigantaxes.com/wordpress/?p=3584#comment-1355</guid>
		<description>If my understanding is correct, it is in full effect when the other states get on board.  That is why the language had the intention element.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If my understanding is correct, it is in full effect when the other states get on board.  That is why the language had the intention element.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R. George Dunn</title>
		<link>http://michigantaxes.com/wordpress/2010/01/%c2%a7-10-limitations-on-terms-of-office-of-members-of-the-united-states-house-of-representatives-and-united-states-senate-from-michigan/comment-page-1/#comment-1354</link>
		<dc:creator>R. George Dunn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 20:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michigantaxes.com/wordpress/?p=3584#comment-1354</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t remember anything in the Constitution that detracts from States limiting their representatives time in Congress.  I remember Congress all up in arms saying the States have no power over them, but that is insane to say.  We should insist that the State Parties honor this and the Secretary of State not allow anyone over the term limits to be on the ballot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t remember anything in the Constitution that detracts from States limiting their representatives time in Congress.  I remember Congress all up in arms saying the States have no power over them, but that is insane to say.  We should insist that the State Parties honor this and the Secretary of State not allow anyone over the term limits to be on the ballot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

