<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Privatizing the UAW or other unions to promote success!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michigantaxes.com/wordpress/2008/11/privatizing-the-uaw-or-other-unions-to-promote-success/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michigantaxes.com/wordpress/2008/11/privatizing-the-uaw-or-other-unions-to-promote-success/</link>
	<description>Ongoing discussion of how Michigan burdens its taxpayers as well as other Michigan Issues, Satire, and Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:10:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jgillman</title>
		<link>http://michigantaxes.com/wordpress/2008/11/privatizing-the-uaw-or-other-unions-to-promote-success/comment-page-1/#comment-410</link>
		<dc:creator>jgillman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 14:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michigantaxes.com/wordpress/?p=810#comment-410</guid>
		<description>The idea is fundamentally to remove government ie: &quot;rent seeking&quot; and let the unions become competing guilds.

The institution of licensing and imposing regulation to hamper the competitive nature of free markets would have to be curtailed.  And the pride element of becoming the provider of the finest talents could make the smaller unions stand out.

As things stand, and also pointed out in the link you provided, government is used to squash the rise to the top of originality and uniqueness.  Years ago, I operated a small towing business which had similar obstacles with regard to an MESC permit.  My main competitor, the &quot;license holder&quot; for the region could deny through process my ability to acquire one.

Fundamental change MUST happen, and soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The idea is fundamentally to remove government ie: &#8220;rent seeking&#8221; and let the unions become competing guilds.</p>
<p>The institution of licensing and imposing regulation to hamper the competitive nature of free markets would have to be curtailed.  And the pride element of becoming the provider of the finest talents could make the smaller unions stand out.</p>
<p>As things stand, and also pointed out in the link you provided, government is used to squash the rise to the top of originality and uniqueness.  Years ago, I operated a small towing business which had similar obstacles with regard to an MESC permit.  My main competitor, the &#8220;license holder&#8221; for the region could deny through process my ability to acquire one.</p>
<p>Fundamental change MUST happen, and soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hershblogger</title>
		<link>http://michigantaxes.com/wordpress/2008/11/privatizing-the-uaw-or-other-unions-to-promote-success/comment-page-1/#comment-409</link>
		<dc:creator>Hershblogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 14:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michigantaxes.com/wordpress/?p=810#comment-409</guid>
		<description>How do we keep these entities from becoming gatekeepers to employment in their sector?  I can see where a new Union could be formed if the existing one(s) started acting like the American Bar Association or the American Medical Association, but those examples show it isn&#039;t that easy, I think.

Or take the National Council for Interior Design Qualification a group created by the American Society of Interior Designers.  http://www.reason.com/blog/show/128680.html - just a bunch of rent seekers.

Another thought is that &quot;for-profit&quot; unions would probably have to specialize, no nurses represented by the SEIU or Teamsters.  No State employees represented by the UAW.

Intriguing idea, in any case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do we keep these entities from becoming gatekeepers to employment in their sector?  I can see where a new Union could be formed if the existing one(s) started acting like the American Bar Association or the American Medical Association, but those examples show it isn&#8217;t that easy, I think.</p>
<p>Or take the National Council for Interior Design Qualification a group created by the American Society of Interior Designers.  <a href="http://www.reason.com/blog/show/128680.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.reason.com/blog/show/128680.html</a> &#8211; just a bunch of rent seekers.</p>
<p>Another thought is that &#8220;for-profit&#8221; unions would probably have to specialize, no nurses represented by the SEIU or Teamsters.  No State employees represented by the UAW.</p>
<p>Intriguing idea, in any case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://michigantaxes.com/wordpress/2008/11/privatizing-the-uaw-or-other-unions-to-promote-success/comment-page-1/#comment-408</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michigantaxes.com/wordpress/?p=810#comment-408</guid>
		<description>Careful, J, these are radical ideas.  Better not show up at any Labor Day parades next year... they can be scary places.

Never forget the Detroit parade in 06 when I was walking with Dick DeVos and we had our lives threatened more than once.  Good times.

--Nick
www.RightMichigan.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Careful, J, these are radical ideas.  Better not show up at any Labor Day parades next year&#8230; they can be scary places.</p>
<p>Never forget the Detroit parade in 06 when I was walking with Dick DeVos and we had our lives threatened more than once.  Good times.</p>
<p>&#8211;Nick<br />
<a href="http://www.RightMichigan.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.RightMichigan.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jgillman</title>
		<link>http://michigantaxes.com/wordpress/2008/11/privatizing-the-uaw-or-other-unions-to-promote-success/comment-page-1/#comment-407</link>
		<dc:creator>jgillman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 00:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michigantaxes.com/wordpress/?p=810#comment-407</guid>
		<description>Worth looking at: http://hotair.com/archives/2008/11/18/ibd-no-givebacks-no-bailout/ even Reich thinks restructuring is needed..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Worth looking at: <a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2008/11/18/ibd-no-givebacks-no-bailout/" rel="nofollow">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/11/18/ibd-no-givebacks-no-bailout/</a> even Reich thinks restructuring is needed..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robert verdi</title>
		<link>http://michigantaxes.com/wordpress/2008/11/privatizing-the-uaw-or-other-unions-to-promote-success/comment-page-1/#comment-406</link>
		<dc:creator>robert verdi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 00:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michigantaxes.com/wordpress/?p=810#comment-406</guid>
		<description>well, an entrenched interest is tough to change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, an entrenched interest is tough to change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

